hasselblad Fri, 15 Sep 2000 Volume 1 : Number 989 In this issue: Re: Introduction... Photokina Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Re: Film recommendations? Re: what film and filter? Re: best tripod for hassy Re: Film recommendations? What happened to the SWC? Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Hasselblad user - Michael Kenna Re: best tripod for hassy Re: best tripod for hassy Film recommendations? Re: Flexbody ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:40:17 EDT From: COHIBA7@aol.com To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: Introduction... Message-ID: That's funny! Regards! Laughing Cow ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:48:57 +0200 From: "Dr. Ulrik Neupert" To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Photokina Message-ID: <39C0BB29.26AA31D5@int.fhg.de> Will there be somebody else of this group visiting the Photokina on Friday, 22nd ? Would be nice to see some of the faces behind these cheesy emails. See you in Cologne Ulrik ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:51:13 -0500 From: Lynda B To: Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: > << haha I already have one of those (3001) (for my 35mm)... > > It just seems so flimsy. I don't want to have the thing topple over on me. > I just put the camera on it.. it sets there okay, but it seems so cheezy >> > > > My 3001 has never toppled over and 90% of my Hasselblad use is outdoors in > rugged terrain. But it is the definitely not the tripod you should buy. You > need a much larger, much heavier and much more expensive one. A serious > tripod, one that won't make you go "haha". I don't need a heavier or expensive one. However, I did take the camera out yesterday with the 3001, and while it works, I don't really feel it has the support I want. I HAVE knocked over this tripod; it doesn't seem solid enough unless I bring a weight of some kind. That's why I NEVER considered it for my Hasselblad. Also, I used Mamiya RB's at school all last year, and try and set one of those on a 3001. Why, I never even CONSIDERED the 3001 an appropriate tripod for medium format. It didn't even dawn on me to even try it. Though I have to admit the hassy is pretty light compared to the RB. I'm glad it works for you. I've been using my Bogen 3233 with the hassy when I needed a tripod, and it works just fine; it's just heavy and a pain to set up and lug around. I was just asking for suggestions. I was just surprised when you mentioned you favored a tripod I ALREADY OWNED... (I only have 2) I don't care about the status or price. That's why my camera is using old chrome lenses and beat-up old 12 backs (all working fine, btw). I do care about quality, though. I've also heard about Gitzo tripods; my instructor told me to get one if I ever buy a new tripod. I like the Bogan 3233, and the 3001 is okay. When I bought it I didn't know much about photography and I was just lucky that I ended up with a Bogan (I didn't even know who they were); I just wanted a tripod. We don't have very good camera stores here in Madison, Wisconsin. So a lot of these tripods aren't on display. I can't afford a carbon tripod... I don't think I need one either. -Lynda ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:33:56 EDT From: InfinityDT@aol.com To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <91.881aa3.26f26604@aol.com> In a message dated 9/14/00 12:51:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lbotez@dukat.cs.wisc.edu writes: << However, I did take the camera out yesterday with the 3001, and while it works, I don't really feel it has the support I want. I HAVE knocked over this tripod; it doesn't seem solid enough unless I bring a weight of some kind. That's why I NEVER considered it for my Hasselblad. Also, I used Mamiya RB's at school all last year, and try and set one of those on a 3001. Why, I never even CONSIDERED the 3001 an appropriate tripod for medium format. It didn't even dawn on me to even try it. Though I have to admit the hassy is pretty light compared to the RB. >> I think I misunderstood your concerns. According to Bogen Photo the 3001 is rated for 13 lbs. The 3262 medium ball head is rated for 8.8 lbs and itself weighs 1 lb. They say their ratings are very conservative, to avoid customer problems. According to Hasselblad USA a 503CW, A12, CF150 and PM5 together weigh 7 lbs 10 Oz. That's 1 lb less than Bogen's conservative rating for the ballhead and (adding in the weight of the ballhead) 4 lbs 6 oz less than what the tripod is rated at. Hardly what I'd call pushing the envelope. But this is all in regards to the tripod legs *bending and collapsing*. If your concern is the tripod falling over sideways, only two things will lessen that possibility (besides watching your own feet and elbows, and making sure the camera strap isn't loose so you can catch on it): mass and footprint. A heavier tripod (or hanging your camera bag from a hook underneath the center column), or a tripod with a larger leg spread (taller tripod with legs spread to the second detent) is what will give you stability. All said, the choice of a tripod is also dictated by your use. I often venture far afield and prefer to burden myself with more lenses and film and less tripod. I took my tips from Galen Rowell who uses a Gitzo 026 that weighs the same as the Nikon F5 he mounts on it. It's a matter of priorities and technique. I'm willing to faithfully never walk away from the tripod when the camera is on it, never use the center-column extended, hang a bag underneath, etc. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:39:09 -0700 From: Mattei To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20000914103909.007b8100@popped.cts.com> -SNIP- A heavier tripod (or hanging your camera bag from a hook >underneath the center column), or a tripod with a larger leg spread (taller >tripod with legs spread to the second detent) is what will give you >stability. Infinity DT: That's right. I have, in the past, lugged-around the FOBA tripod and benefitted from its mass, joking that It would be great to have someone extra just to carry it. One day, I woke up. I went to the hardware store and got some shock cord. With this, I just take a strain from my bag to the head or leg-set of my lighter Linhof tripods. No stress, no worries. The FOBA stays in-house. Peter Mattei ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:44:00 -0700 From: "Bill Fowle" To: Subject: Re: Film recommendations? Message-ID: <002801ca333a$912f5b00$01c804c0@cr974313a> No one has yet mentioned the Agfa Ultra 50. Extremely fine grain and also the most saturated colour print film on the market. Bill Fowle (bill@gobc.com) Fowle Foto (fowlefoto@gobc.com) http://www.gobc.com/fowlefoto ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:11:45 -0400 From: "Bill Rektorik-Contractor" To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: what film and filter? Message-ID: KS, Be careful at the race, a track worker was killed Sunday at the Grand Prix in Monza Italy. Debris hit him after several cars crashed together. On another note, there is a book that I own, called Freezing Speed, which is strickly about Grand Prix photography. I forgot the auther/photographers name. Its a very good book. As far as film, I would probably use Kodak E100S or Fuji Provia 400F (RHPIII). The Provia would probably be safer for bad weather and Fuji claims it can be pushed to 1600. Good luck and enjoy the race. P.S. World Champianship Grand Prix racing is the second most photographed sport in the world behind soccor. Bill ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:22:10 EDT From: InfinityDT@aol.com To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <7c.aeb3b13.26f27152@aol.com> In a message dated 9/14/00 1:47:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mattei@cts.com writes: << I went to the hardware store and got some shock cord. With this, I just take a strain from my bag to the head or leg-set of my lighter Linhof tripods. >> With Gitzo tripods (and the Kirk Enterprises short columns also) there's a female thread in the base of the center column. I buy what are called (in the US at least) "eye-bolts" which are like a closed-end hook (hooks snag things) that thread into the column. To this I use an "S" hook to attach the camera bag . The newer Gitzos have a built-in hook. I would still pinch this closed and use an S hook. Another tripod stabilizing device which can be attached with the s hook is a bicycle innertube. Then just step it to the ground with your foot. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:24:52 EDT From: InfinityDT@aol.com To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: Film recommendations? Message-ID: <5e.9fbf93.26f271f4@aol.com> In a message dated 9/14/00 2:21:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, fowlefoto@gobc.com writes: << No one has yet mentioned the Agfa Ultra 50. Extremely fine grain and also the most saturated colour print film on the market. >> I've used Ultra a lot. Saturated, and how! But I found it to be just as contrasty and narrow-latitude as chrome so not to my advantage. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:38:02 -0400 From: "Stuart Phillips" To: Subject: What happened to the SWC? Message-ID: <005101c01ce8$95319960$3674799e@umb.edu> I think we all deserve an answer to the fate of the 15-year-old superwide! What gives? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:41:32 -0400 From: "Stuart Phillips" To: Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <005901c01ce9$12743fe0$3674799e@umb.edu> This is the best description I have ever read in English for what Leonardo called a Hassy-catapulto. It was from this strange device that Galileo developed the telescope. Seriously though, I'd hate to describe this to an insurance company. "And then you put your.." ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 2:22 PM Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy > In a message dated 9/14/00 1:47:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mattei@cts.com > writes: > > << I went to the hardware store > and got some shock cord. With this, I just take a strain from my bag to > the head or leg-set of my lighter Linhof tripods. >> > > With Gitzo tripods (and the Kirk Enterprises short columns also) there's a > female thread in the base of the center column. I buy what are called (in > the US at least) "eye-bolts" which are like a closed-end hook (hooks snag > things) that thread into the column. To this I use an "S" hook to attach the > camera bag . The newer Gitzos have a built-in hook. I would still pinch > this closed and use an S hook. Another tripod stabilizing device which can > be attached with the s hook is a bicycle innertube. Then just step it to the > ground with your foot. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The Hasselblad Users Group Listserv is a public service of Absolute Internet, Inc., which is not responsible for its content. This mailing list is in no way affiliated with Victor Hasselblad AB, it's subsidiaries, or affiliates. > > To change your subscription status, go to: http://mail.kelvin.net/guest/RemoteListSummary/Hasselblad > Digest archives are stored at http://www.kelvin.net/hasselblad/hassy.htm > Searchable archives can be found at http://www.listquest.com/arts/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:46:44 -0500 From: Lynda B To: Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: >A heavier tripod (or hanging your camera bag from a hook >underneath the center column), or a tripod with a larger leg spread (taller >tripod with legs spread to the second detent) is what will give you >stability. That's it! I think a taller tripod is what I want. I often have the 3001 all the way out... seems rather feeble on those bottom legs... plus I often extend out the center-column. Now you can see why I'm concerned. >All said, the choice of a tripod is also dictated by your use. I often >venture far afield and prefer to burden myself with more lenses and film and >less tripod. I took my tips from Galen Rowell who uses a Gitzo 026 that >weighs the same as the Nikon F5 he mounts on it. It's a matter of priorities >and technique. I'm willing to faithfully never walk away from the tripod >when the camera is on it, never use the center-column extended, hang a bag >underneath, etc. I like the idea of hanging something from the center column. I'm going to try that. And what's your opinion on center columns (on more sturdier tripods)? Is it worth it to get a longer one? I unfortunately like to walk away from the camera to meter light. Probably a bod habit I developed with my view camera. I guess I'm used to being in a studio. I have this Sekonic 508 I got for school, and I like to meter light a lot. Thanks for the all the info. -Lynda ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:52:00 -0700 From: Jim Stewart To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <39C11E50.D6BED162@jkmicro.com> Lynda B wrote: > > >A heavier tripod (or hanging your camera bag from a hook > >underneath the center column), or a tripod with a larger leg spread (taller > >tripod with legs spread to the second detent) is what will give you > >stability. I really wanted to stay out of this thread, but I guess I have to put in my 2 cents. I picked up an old Quickset tripod designed for small television cameras. It was $30 at a swap meet. It's heavy and the head sucks, but it is incredibly solid. I do alot of product shots under hot lights with exposure times of 1/8 to 1 second and I have never had an unsharp exposure with it. Jim ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:16:57 -0400 From: "Stuart Phillips" To: Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <006301c01cee$04c99d90$3674799e@umb.edu> I can see how someone might need to use one, but I don't like center columns much. In fact come to think of it neither of the pods I use now have them. In the past I've had them, but as I say, don't like them. I like the advice: "Get the sturdiest support you WILL carry." As for knocking the thing over, I think that's a good argument for getting and using a monopod. You will not knock it over because it won't stay up without you. snp ----- Original Message ----- From: Lynda B To: Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 2:46 PM Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy > >A heavier tripod (or hanging your camera bag from a hook > >underneath the center column), or a tripod with a larger leg spread (taller > >tripod with legs spread to the second detent) is what will give you > >stability. > > That's it! I think a taller tripod is what I want. I often have the 3001 > all the way out... seems rather feeble on those bottom legs... plus I often > extend out the center-column. Now you can see why I'm concerned. > > > >All said, the choice of a tripod is also dictated by your use. I often > >venture far afield and prefer to burden myself with more lenses and film and > >less tripod. I took my tips from Galen Rowell who uses a Gitzo 026 that > >weighs the same as the Nikon F5 he mounts on it. It's a matter of priorities > >and technique. I'm willing to faithfully never walk away from the tripod > >when the camera is on it, never use the center-column extended, hang a bag > >underneath, etc. > > I like the idea of hanging something from the center column. I'm going to > try that. And what's your opinion on center columns (on more sturdier > tripods)? Is it worth it to get a longer one? > > I unfortunately like to walk away from the camera to meter light. Probably > a bod habit I developed with my view camera. I guess I'm used to being in a > studio. I have this Sekonic 508 I got for school, and I like to meter light > a lot. > > Thanks for the all the info. > > -Lynda > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The Hasselblad Users Group Listserv is a public service of Absolute Internet, Inc., which is not responsible for its content. This mailing list is in no way affiliated with Victor Hasselblad AB, it's subsidiaries, or affiliates. > > To change your subscription status, go to: http://mail.kelvin.net/guest/RemoteListSummary/Hasselblad > Digest archives are stored at http://www.kelvin.net/hasselblad/hassy.htm > Searchable archives can be found at http://www.listquest.com/arts/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:35:08 +0100 From: "Gary Rowlands" To: Subject: Hasselblad user - Michael Kenna Message-ID: <00c301c01e83$86790100$0d022cc3@default> Michael has used a Hasselblad with a wide angle lens. I've visited a few of his locations and estimate that he is using a lens wider than 50mm. Does anyone know if he uses a 40mm or an SWC? Gaz ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:40:13 EDT From: InfinityDT@aol.com To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <13.ac0b615.26f291ad@aol.com> In a message dated 9/14/00 2:47:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lbotez@dukat.cs.wisc.edu writes: << And what's your opinion on center columns (on more sturdier tripods)? Is it worth it to get a longer one? I unfortunately like to walk away from the camera to meter light. >> By "a longer one" you mean the center column? Center columns are great in the studio and on location with flash. A long center column makes a 3-legged monopod. With long lenses and/or slow shutter speeds they're the death rattle of sharp photographs. Cut it off, get a short one, use a bolt and washers to attach the head directly to the yoke....*anything* but don't extend it or get a longer one. Get a taller tripod than you are. The advantage to that is if you're on a hill facing down you can extend the front leg and not lose height. The rest of the time you never extend the skinniest legs, and you may even be able to spread the legs wider and still have enough height left, particularly if you use the waistlevel finder and frankly I've never seen the need for a prism for scenic/landscape use. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:44:06 -0700 From: Mark Rabiner To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: best tripod for hassy Message-ID: <39C162C6.31CA394A@rabiner.cncoffice.com> Stuart Phillips wrote: > > I can see how someone might need to use one, but I don't like center columns > much. In fact come to think of it neither of the pods I use now have them. > In the past I've had them, but as I say, don't like them. > > I like the advice: "Get the sturdiest support you WILL carry." As for > knocking the thing over, I think that's a good argument for getting and > using a monopod. You will not knock it over because it won't stay up > without you. > Those black foam things from Op/Tech make for a heavier tripod to throw over ones shoulder! I love them! The make a tripod much more friendlier to handle! http://www.optechusa.com/dealer.htm Mark W. Rabiner :) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:28:01 -0300 From: "Eduardo Aigner" To: Subject: Film recommendations? Message-ID: <011c01c01e79$8a524f20$8f0cd5c8@EduardoAigner> > No one has yet mentioned the Agfa Ultra 50. Extremely fine grain and also > the most saturated colour print film on the market. What happaned to Ektar 25??? Great print film. AIGNER ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:06:48 -0700 From: Phil Lindsay To: hasselblad@kelvin.net Subject: Re: Flexbody Message-ID: <39C1A058.37D71B9F@pacbell.net> Check Shutterbug - I have seen a number of used Flexibody for in the $1500 - 1800 price range. It's a great little camera Good luck Phil ------------------------------ End of hasselblad V1 #989 ************************* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Hasselblad Users Group Listserv is a public service of Absolute Internet, Inc., which is not responsible for its content. This mailing list is in no way affiliated with Victor Hasselblad AB, it's subsidiaries, or affiliates. To change your subscription status, go to: http://mail.kelvin.net/guest/RemoteListSummary/Hasselblad Digest archives are stored at http://www.kelvin.net/hasselblad/hassy.htm Searchable archives can be found at http://www.listquest.com/arts/index.html